Response to Everybody's Nickname

This passage had little clarity. If there were more details, the work would have made more sense to me even though I am not a big sci-fi person. The essay was only directed at one specific audience. It is about the doubleness of man and one living a double life. People never live their lives as one. The essay did not get more interesting until the ending. The introduction was very clever, almost too much so. There was too much of his own personal excitement taking place and was not on the same page as the audience. If there was more clarity going on, the essay would have been more appealing and made more sense. There were some positive points made in the essay such as the doubleness of man, there was a clever title, and it was directed towards a specific audience, but not exactly towards college students. The freshness idea looks at two sides of a book. This essay shows a picture of the title of one of the books the author analyzes. This is important because it is used to depict the entire ideas of the essay. The picture itself makes it clear that no one would buy the book because it is obvious that this would not catch the attention of a typical college student. This essay "takes time to breathe" which makes the audience think he needs to relax because he wants to get his point across but he is very emotional when doing so. He is very frantic. This essay is one in which if I read it five times there would be at one interesting detail in it, but overall, it does not get my attention. He gets wrapped up in the words too much. This essay is like a review by the author analyzing doubleness, and realness. He also shows evidence by looking at two books in one.