Response to "It's Always Sunny in Philly"

The actions that were taken by the owners of the bar were distasteful. There is always negativity in the media and it is understandable that they were angry with the review of the man but they did not have to take out their frustrations in such a way. They did not act maturely and made themselves appear foolish. The writer of the review was a bit biased because he seemed to be a snooty man who thought he was better than other people of a lower class. They got themselves into a mess because the lies they told got them into more lies. By kidnapping the man, they were in the wrong because the man did nothing to them personally. The owners still got plenty of business and a review doesn't mean everything to them because people have different ideas of what is "classy". The actual review itself did not exactly point out any positive points about the bar which was not what the criteria is for an actual review. The man should have printed a new review though so it would not present the bar to be as bad as he made it out to be. I saw the bar and thought things could have been a lot worse, maybe not the bathroom though. If they fixed things up a little then maybe the review would have been more positive. Though, I think the man would have made a review like that for any place that doesn't look like the "Hilton". Maybe if the bathroom was a bit cleaner, the review would have been better. The barowners should not have stooped down to the writer's level because he truly was a snooty man. This episode was a humorous way to display what a review was and made the class interested in what a a review was all about.